It is a hormone secreted by the pancreas that decreases the blood glucose level.
The pancreas of freshly slaughtered cattle or pigs.
It was expensive and there were insufficient quantities.
The supply of insulin was controlled by the demand for meat rather than the need for diabetics/kill more animals.
Insulin extracted was sometimes contaminated with pancreatic enzymes and thus not pure.
It is pure human insulin/contains no allergens.
It could be produced on demand.
It doesn’t offend vegans or people who don’t eat pork.
It is cheaper in the long term.
It doesn’t harm animals / infringe their rights.
Used to cut the insulin gene/used to cut the plasmid at specific point/used to splice the desirable gene into the vector.
It is cut open and used as a gene vector.
Used to culture bacteria under optimal conditions/under optimal pH, temperature and nutrient levels/mass production.
protein synthesis
No
Suspect 3. DNA from the hair sample is identical to his.
No. There are no other matches between the blood samples of the suspects and the DNA found on the victim.
No.
The victim could have picked up the hair and skin tissue from one of the suspects when she had come into contact with them prior to the murder, and having these under her nails does not necessarily mean that the people whom the hair and skin tissue belong to, are definitely murderers.
The suspect may have an identical twin who has the same DNA.
Hair and skin tissue could have been planted at the crime scene.
Samples taken could have been mixed in the laboratory.
Yes. It would be easier to track criminals and this may deter people from committing crimes, hence, a decrease in the crime rate of our country. It can also be used to track children who have been separated from parents or siblings who have been separated from each other, or it can be used for paternity tests or to identify missing persons.
OR
No. Until a uniform method or uniform standards are developed for taking the fingerprint, errors could result in innocent victims being convicted or guilty persons being set free. It infringes on the rights of people who may not want their fingerprints taken. It would cost the government too much money which could be used for basic needs like food, housing, water, electricity, etc.
